Information technologies bring a lot to scaling processes. They facilitate large-scale dissemination of ideas, provide new marketplaces and contribute to reducing the marginal costs of services and products as clearly explained by Jeremy Rifkin. Using online platforms, the growth of start-ups can be extremely rapid (see our post on exponential organisations): it has for instance taken only a couple of years for companies such as Airbnb or Uber to reach the status of unicorn (i.e. a 1 billion valorisation). When looking at most rapidly scaling organisations, what is striking is that they typically:
- outsource many of their activities and attract resources far beyond their initial customer base: they crowdsource their knowledge and make use of assets that do not belong to them;
- have an “indirect” business model: they help other organisations or people develop their value propositions and build their own business models on very large number of users generating indirect payment mechanisms based on advertisements or “connexion fees”. In this model, “controlling” resources or assets is no longer a competitive advantage.
This process of rapid scaling is generally facilitated by an online platform that becomes the playground of a large group of actors. Platforms are much more than IT tools, they are the aggregators of communities, the instruments where value is generated, the catalysers of reduced marginal costs and as such, they are playing a key role in the scaling of new solutions, including for humanity on a safer planet.
So what are important features of these platforms and what role can they play in scaling?
Crowdsourcing
First of all, platforms contribute to build new mind-sets and new values in many ways. In the emerging world, each of us can play its (little) role, each of us can be connected to one or several communities, have access to multiple (often too many!) sources of information. Platform users are in general not passive. They bring their opinions, they help benchmark products, they sell or promote their products and by doing so they generate value. They contribute to creating “communities” that gather people of similar interests or mind-sets. Platform contribute to transform consumers into “prosumers” i.e. active consumers who understand their power to influence the production and trade patterns.
For their operators, platforms help building value from the crowd and think outside the box. For any company development, a key question is: what resources should I mobilise and keep internally and what resources should I outsource? Platforms have been a game changer in that respect. Outsourcing has been made much easier through plug and play approaches e.g. through standardized Application Programming Interfaces (APIs), and the boundaries between internal and external have clearly moved, provided companies are able to valorise and integrate external values into internal ones.
Linked to the above is a major evolution of the business models. In his book “Platform scale” (link) Paul Choudary distinguishes “pipe scaling”, i.e. the traditional scaling “powered by the ability to coordinate internal labour and resources toward efficient value creation from “platform scaling” i.e. a “business scale powered by the ability to leverage and orchestrate a global connected ecosystem of producers and consumers toward efficient value creation and exchange.”
The notion of ecosystem is essential here: actors aggregated are not passive actors, they have specific roles and functions. In essence platform scaling is not linear and disrupts the classical supply chain approach by facilitating the upstream involvement of value producers and the development of an ecosystem where value is generated by exchanges and not merely by production: as stated by Paul Choudary, “the ecosystem is the new supply chain”.
For-profit versus non-for-profit
Another important feature of platforms is a blurred boundary between for-profit and not-for-profit models. To be successful, a platform needs to attract a large community (the crowd) and to provide sufficient value to that community. In most cases, this means that it needs to be as open as possible. It will therefore be free for its community members, benefiting from the ”zero marginal cost” effect, and generate its revenues through other offers often enabled by the information collected by powerful algorithms.
For instance, big platforms such as those provided by Apple or Google attract professionals ready to pay for adverts or to have their apps available through the platform. Dropbox (as well as many other online services) provides another example where most of the “small scale customers” are provided a service for free while a small percentage of “professional users” agree to pay and to support the development of the whole.
While the examples above relate to large classical companies, the approach can also be used to facilitate scaling of local successes. Platforms can be used to collect good ideas, create communities of practice and also anonymize data collected in a business (and competitive) context.
From common good to public good
Platforms are not only useful to businesses but they are also emerging in the area of “common or public good”. Nicolas Colin and Henri Verdier show in L’âge de la Multitude (Age of Multitude) that the crowd can also be used to develop public good and contribute to the emergence of new public services. The idea stems from the observation that many NGOs and social enterprises actually deliver public goods in many areas: unemployment, education, health, environmental protection. In many cases their performance is better than traditional state services. Therefore States could work as large scale platforms and leverage the capacity of these organisations to deliver. They would then benefit from the platform capacity to crowdsource energy and creativity, to mobilise external resources, to standardize approaches.
Platform example: We Make It
WeMakeIt is a crowdfunding platform that helps you develop and fund your project.
Wemakeit has offices in Zurich, Basel and Lausanne, is also present in Vienna, Berlin and Bellinzona and gathers an international community.
Platform example: Climate Collab
The Climate Colab is a crowdsourcing platform of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT). Its goal is to harness the collective intelligence of thousands of people from all around the world to address global climate change. Currently (Feb 2017) the platform has 80,000 members.
The Climate CoLab, runs a series of open innovation contests to find solutions for numerous challenges presented by our planet’s changing climate. These contests are assessed by experts who pick finalists. These experts together with the community pick the most promising proposals.
2000 proposals have been received so far and have addressed around 15 contests per year.
Resource 1: Platform Scale |Book
Platform scale explains the various manifestations of the platform approach and the major success or failure factors. It is a builder’s manual for anyone building a platform business today. It lays out a structured approach to designing and growing a platform business model and addresses the key factors that lead to success and failure of these businesses.
Resource 2: L'âge de la Multitude |Book
La révolution numérique bouleverse la manière d’entreprendre et de gouverner. C’est particulièrement au travers de “plateformes” sur lesquelles interagissent une multitude d’acteurs que cette révolution se produit. Tous les secteurs de l’économie, jusqu’à l’Etat, bénéficient de cette nouvelle forme de développement d’une intelligence collective